Why the Muslim world is not so fond of the West

A different phenomenon to any other widely flourished in recent decades, coagulating always so rapidly in many parts of the world: general aversion to the west. And as individuals educated and thoughtful, it is our absolute duty to investigate the cause of this situation for the treatment and prevention of cancer and metastasize. First of all that may be the right direction, the root cause of the problem must be thoroughly investigated (although all the reasons that require more than a compendium that should be fully tested). To understand this horrible phenomenon, it is essential to look to their state of being in the Islamic world, especially in the Middle East. For many years there has been expansion, self-created ocean of hatred towards the West, particularly Britain and the United States by many Muslims. Although many neoconservatives and their parents would like the world may believe that this attitude came to be caused only totally free in nature as they say, the reality is unfortunately otherwise. This feeling, shared by millions of people, was created by the policies of Western political, unjust, irritating and completely negligible. Now this is not a rationalization or a defense of the atrocities committed by some extremists, which is a misnomer to call the Muslims. On the other hand, it is an attempt to understand this serious problem, a political viewpoint to a pathological disease with potentially dire prognosis.

Britain, the rule of imperial supremacy in the early 20th century, created the first ingredient of this mixture of emotions rancid hatred. At first it was sending Thomas Edward Lawrence, later popularized as Lawrence of Arabia, to destabilize the Ottoman Empire internally, to incite riots in the Islamic world. While disguised under a cloak of lies during the First World War, Britain then occupied and oppressed people in modern Jordan, Palestine, Iraq, and many non-Muslim countries, such as India and China. Make agreements such as the Sykes-Pico (When the French were involved as well) after the fall of the Ottoman Empire, Britain was then making the Balfour Declaration in 1917 hideously unjustified. This promise guaranteed members of a Jewish homeland in the territory of others. Promised of some authority there, a land where Palestinians live and to another person. So was the British disgustingly obsessed with power that they even considered to offer Uganda or Argentina Jews as an alternative country. This constant, self-given title to land of others is what first led to a sense of injustice and betrayal absolute Arabs and Muslims.

The second and more reason to hate the impact of this support is of course perfectly vociferous west to the illegal occupation criminal and certainly the Palestinian lands. The continued support of the West, namely the United States and Britain, Israel in all its efforts, no matter how justified, led to the view held by most Muslims that the international community is against them. Of course, this can be analyzed historically. While Churchill was playing his speeches anaphoric around the world, his country supported the illegal declaration in 1948, almost twenty years after the Balfour Declaration, of Israel as a state. Indeed, even Churchill himself, the example of the view epitomic chauvinistic towards Muslims, after being asked about the issue of Palestine, said that "I do not think the dog has the right to the manger, no matter how long you've been." That was the mentality of the time and many may countries argue that, after almost seventy years, have recovered from the atrocities committed by the British and the enmity that should no longer be common. Unfortunately, That may be true that the British had ceased their self-determined, free trade, almost divine providence over the lands of others. In other words, the domain of the British, apparently removed after the abolition of the British mandate, still persisted. Continued to supply arms, weapons and financial political support for increasing the number of illegal settlements of Palestinian land. Not only that, but the British, despite the presence of the Council of the UN It also did not react to the atrocities committed by the Zionist gangs, including the Irgun, Haganah and many of the organizations Manachem Bagens genocidal operating under Theodore Herzl disengagement plan and the transfer of Palestinians, equivalent to the Nazi holocaust. The whole world has been properly educated about the disgusting acts of the Holocaust, but nobody knows about Deir Yasin, Qana, Gineen, Sabra and Shatila. These were, like the Holocaust, mass murder, but this time Jews were not killed, but Palestinians massacred in cold blood and forced to flee by the Israeli war machine. The victim became the aggressor and all these acts were neglected and tolerated blatantly. Not only that, but the West continued to support his new ally in the Middle East. A good example is when Israel, Britain and France attacked Egypt near the tripartite aggression in 1959. This undeniable and deliberate invasion, this violation of international law is yet another injustice against the world Islamic. One would think that after such violence, no more has followed. But still, the evil desire of bloodshed, and the obvious hostility to Israel and the West continued and in 1967, when it was occupied Sinai. The Six Day War, as it became known, formed a kind of self- defense, led to the occupation of neighboring territories (Sinai, Gaza Strip, West Bank, Golan Heights) to fulfill the dream of a state Jew from the Nile to the Euphrates. This invasion was supported by the U.S., which provides continuous information to the Israeli generals, including the hawkish Ariel Sharon. Over time, some territories were recovered, some Arabs in exchange for promised submission by puppet rulers of the time (as Hafiz al-Assad and Sadat). In fact, the stage is being set for another act of belligerence towards an internally and externally and oppressed Muslim world. In 1982, Israel invaded Lebanon, once again, hiding behind the excuse of retaliation repeated instead of clear aggression. Thousands were killed, Beirut reduced to ruble and the concentration residences, and the camps established for the many refugees and victims families. The U.S. response and Britain, if there was any, was very warm, and permanent violation of the Israeli-backed so-called breaches of international law continued.

The early and support of mid-20th century West towards Israel continues and continues today. A good example of dogged devotion of U.S. presidents to Israel can be tested by the means by which they are elected. Live in "democracy" we live in, no U.S. president who wish to reside in the White House must be the poodle of AIPAC, the American Israel Public Affairs Committee. Bush father and son were tied to the belt, but Barack Obama, Vice President Dick Cheney, Bill Clinton and many more present and continues to report to the Israeli lobby. Not surprisingly, then, to hear President Bush referring to Israel as the closest ally of the United States and witness his frequent visits to the room. And certainly it is not surprising either that each vote of the UN, the United States, represented by crazed conservatives like John Bolton, the pro-Israel votes and vetoes any fair or just resolution to the Muslims. In fact, apartheid has been and is being established in Israel, and the U.S., Britain and many approve. Already on the construction of the West Bank barrier to separate Palestinians from society, or the hunger of the innocent civilians in Gaza by the orders of the current Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and their bouquets, the West remains silent. The complex responses without mild mean nothing and did nothing like this pandemonium of violence continues. Another example is the summer of 2006 the invasion, a 33-day war and a second invasion of Lebanon. On his way usually cyclical, Western governments declared war to be an act of self-defense, claiming that the killing of hundreds of civilians and abduction of hundreds was an entirely justifiable response to the kidnapping of two Israeli soldiers who were illegally in Lebanon at the time of his abduction. Qana, which was the place where he almost died, Ariel Sharon, massacred hundreds, was once again an object Israeli genocide when a building full of innocent children and families, was bombed. And all we have are useless condemnation and suppression of international protests. All of this injustice committed during the decades that we are so often encouraged to forget, is just one reason for the "swamp of hatred", as George Galloway said, was created.

The United States also replaces the feeling of contempt for Muslims when they invaded Iraq in the 1990 Gulf War. Justifying as a kind of liberating act of generosity of America, the Iraq war was really a cruel attempt to control the financial resources of one of the richest states in the Arab Muslim world. In fact, Donald Rumsfeld, whom many consider as far as war criminal as the recently captured Karadzic, Saddam Hussein visited and provided the maps and weapons to invade Kuwait. With this encouragement, Saddam invaded Kuwait and the U.S. had succeeded in creating a rationalization for the invasion Iraq. This treacherous act, unscrupulous and illegal not only brings bloodshed in the Middle East, but allowed the kleptomaniac of a ruler George Bush Sr. to get their hands on tons of oil in the Middle East. After having killed thousands of innocent Iraqis and plunged the country into an abyss of economic depression and humanitarian, U.S. said its economic gains and left only to be reviewed by the ignorant idiot son George Bush a year later. Using the world after emotional burden horrible acts not tolerable for 9 / 11, that no Muslim would support or excuse Bush and Blair's wrist, despite international opposition to war, illegally invaded Iraq once again. Hundreds of thousands of Iraqis have died as a result, sectarian conflicts flourished, thousands of millions of dollars were looted and crimes like Abu Ghraib, where prisoners were tortured and humiliated by the perverse entertainment of soldiers and Fallujah, where thousands of innocent civilians were dead, were committed. All this was due to the manufacture of the facts by Colin Powell and many more, and the U.S. refusal to listen to their own agencies intelligence that Iraq had no weapons of mass destruction and had relations with al Qaeda well as Mother Teresa did. But that was not enough to satisfy the lust George Bush abominable blood. After invading Afghanistan, Mr. Bush went on to create torture prisons like Guantanamo, where prisoners were taken, the rose water and starved to provide information that he had no Bin Laden. Who is Bin Laden? Not the man who has been sent by the United States itself to fight the Soviet Union in the 1980s? Not the man who was supplied by the U.S. with arms and money to do their dirty work in the region? Not the U.S. criminal had created? All this, and yet the question remains, why the world, not just Muslims hate the West?

So great is the negative influence of the West and obscene in the Muslim world that have been successful in recruiting all the staff, everyone unfair, unscrupulous to be their puppet ruler divided the Muslim world. Recently, Omar Al Bashir, the Sudanese president accused of crimes against humanity in Darfur Region. Before Saddam was accused of the same. However, it is impossible to find the same charges lain with reason against the late King Hussein of Jordan, his son King Abdullah, the kings of Saudi Arabia, Hafez al-Assad of Syria Hussni Mubarak, "President" of Egypt. Is the King Hussein who bombed his own capital in 1970 and installed his own son as king after his death and acted was a servant to the Israeli Mossad, not a criminal? Is King Abdullah, who plays for the public's money and lives in a palace while his people starve inflation and high oil prices not a repugnant criminal? It Hussni Mubarak, who has been president for more than 20, somnolently waste the country's money is not a criminal? They are corrupt kings kleptomonarchy Saudi Arabia, uneducated and illiterate, law enforcement submission and oppression, while not on the president's largest oil supply criminals? In the eyes of Western governments are not economically because they hold his country, however, in the eyes of common sense and humanitarian educated individual, they are. When Muslims see King Abdullah of Saudi Arabia dance with Bush, while the American military to kill Muslim civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan and the supply of Israeli Apaches and F-16, what will they think? What think? Shackled and chained in a figurative prison, the Muslim world knows that all are politically corrupt leaders with U.S. support in exchange for benefit economic. And this, this is what contributes to hatred.

The latest attempt to punish the West irrationally Islamic countries is the attempt to not allow Iran to possess nuclear energy. constant expressions of western governments, stress that Iran has no right to have nuclear power. However, a can not help but wonder why? Why the U.S., India and Israel, as his own agent of Mordechai Vanunu, announced to the world in 1986 that has hundreds of nuclear weapons capable of reaching all Muslim countries, the allocation of nuclear weapons? Claiming that they are responsible for having such terrible devices, one must also ask why they, as the British had done before them, they must decide who is responsible and who is not responsible for owning nuclear weapons not to mention nuclear energy? In fact, Iran, like Iraq, and has no nuclear weapons. He does however plan to have nuclear energy a source of energy. Is not his legal right? In addition, the United States seems to have fallen under the delusion that you can selectively choose which countries can and can not have them. Pakistan, which is governed by another tyrant, the tyrant General Musharraf, was encouraged in fact have nuclear weapons and rewarded for developing them by the United States. However, Iran, only because it is against the abhorrent policy of the United States and Britain, and only because it is against illegal occupation of Palestine by Israel can not have them. Such selectivity is absurd that leads to the fury in the Islamic world.

The last ingredient to this mixture of self-contempt is the bias created by negative media, shown every day in all Western news channels. For starters, Rupert Murdoch, a man whose loyalty was known to have changed according to the location of his business enterprises, owns the most biased news channels, characterized by nothing more nor less than the big lie and absolute ability to produce half-truths and nonsense. Sky News, Fox and many more, to reporters as Bill O'Reilly, Michelle Malkin and botting Anna, are all trends that are elusive when confronted with truths and arrogant in their bias unforgivable. But not only that, CNN and the BBC, masquerading as a kind of news channels have two sides, also equate Islam with terrorism and indecent and immoral characters imply the Muslim faith. Undoubtedly, this type of reporting is what has led the growing hatred on both sides, which is now popular for Americans of discriminating against Muslims wear the hijab and where much animosity and distrust of Americans has been formed. What did the Taliban, in violation of Islam, is being reported as Islamic tradition and the hijab, worn by choice and is considered a sign of modesty and devotion is fashionable now as a kind of oppression. Criminal acts, such as sacrifice of the members of a Palestinian family by an Israeli warship have not seen, and the Israeli apartheid is now regularly justified as a defense rather own error or convicted. This, together with more selective and constant involvement of Islam as an evil doctrine is discriminatory and discerning all members of society must take all measures to prevent further prosper.

It must now also recognize that not only Muslims but people from around the world share unfortunate but real feelings towards the west. In Vietnam, where children are born with birth defects and deformities as a result of inexcusable invasion the 1960s, U.S. citizens the lack of respect for their horrific acts. Even in China, Western interference and excessive media bias have prompted the failure and in many more countries, this is also valid. It must realize that this is not an unfounded hatred of people, but a hatred of autocracy and hegemony Western subtle. The uncontrolled and excessive support of Israeli policies, the endless killing and invasion of Muslims, political support selective tyranny and the bias of the media without background are just some of the reasons for this. Often, we are told that the West is working to improve life for validating His shed blood. However, why anyone should believe instilment constant delusions as to the benevolence of the West and its policies. It is time for a change. It is time for the West to recognize its shortcomings and deal fairly with an area into an abyss of despair, poverty and despotism. It is time to pause in policy creating hundreds of Bin Laden and Zarqawi daily.

For BBJ

About the Author

[FR] Tuto Bypass All Games with Anon Proxy